Postgraduate Education in Artificial Intelligence: A Proposal from the Artificial Intelligence Commission of the Portuguese Medical Association
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.25177Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Internship and ResidencyAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering clinical practice through decision-support systems, predictive tools, generative models, and clinical documentation solutions. Since February 2025, the European AI Act has required providers and deployers of AI systems to ensure that staff and other people operating or using such systems on their behalf have an adequate level of AI literacy. This creates a new educational requirement: physicians need to acquire minimum competencies to use, appraise, supervise, and reject AI outputs when appropriate. This state-of-the-art review examined AI competencies relevant to postgraduate medical training, focusing on literature published since 2022. The reviewed literature suggests thematic convergence around six core domains: foundational AI literacy, critical appraisal of AI tools, safe clinical application, ethics/law/governance, patient communication, and health data literacy. Other domains, such as institutional implementation, multidisciplinary collaboration, and AI leadership, appear as intermediate or advanced competencies. We propose a three-tier curricular organization: baseline competencies for all physicians; proficient competencies for physicians involved in local appraisal and implementation of AI systems; and advanced competencies for clinician-scientists, institutional leaders, and professionals with formal responsibilities in AI governance. In the Portuguese context, this structure may support the development of transversal training for residents and specialists, aligned with technological change, European regulatory requirements, and the need to preserve human clinical responsibility. This proposal should be understood as a conceptual basis for multidisciplinary consensus validation.
Downloads
References
Maddox TM, Embí P, Gerhart J, Goldsack J, Parikh RB, Sarich TC. Generative AI in Medicine - evaluating progress and challenges. NEJM. 2025;392:2479-83.
Kewalramani D, Jawa RS, Martin CA. Position statement from the society of University surgeons, surgical education committee: artificial intelligence in surgical training for medical students, residents, and fellows. Surgery. 2026;190:109849.
Verghese BG, Iyer C, Borse T, Cooper S, White J, Sheehy R. Modern artificial intelligence and large language models in graduate medical education: a scoping review of attitudes, applications & practice. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:730.
Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, Uraiby H, Xu NY, Bartlett R, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 2024;46:446-70.
European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act). Off J Eur Union. 2024.
European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI). 2025. [consultado 2026 jun 07]. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025PC0836.
Zainal H, Chuan VT, Xiaohui X, Thumboo J, Yong FK. From principle to practice: developing a digital-age clinical artificial intelligence ethics competence framework through early-career doctors’ experiences. Med Educ. 2026;60:1035-45.
Ke Y, Jin L, Ong JC, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Car J, Cheung CY, et al. AI-induced never-skilling in medical education. Nat Med. 2026;32:1997-2006.
Jassar S, Zhou Z, Leonard S, Youssef A, Probyn L, Kulasegaram K, et al. Educational competencies for artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review. Acad Radiol. 2025;32:5624-34.
Schuitmaker L, Drogt J, Benders M, Jongsma K. Physicians’ required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2025;153:ldae025.
Gazquez-Garcia J, Sánchez-Bocanegra CL, Sevillano JL. AI in the health sector: systematic review of key skills for future health professionals. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e58161.
Ferraz-Costa G, Griné M, Oliveira-Santos M, Teixeira R. Performance of ChatGPT in the Portuguese national residency access examination. Acta Med Port. 2025;38:170-4.
Prazeres F. ChatGPT’s performance on portuguese medical examination questions: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5 Turbo and ChatGPT-4o Mini. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e65108.
Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde. SPMS lança white paper “inteligência artificial nas organizações de saúde: implementação integrada, segura e ética”. Lisboa: SPMS; 2025.
Abernethy J, Shah A, Chen B, Reynolds S, Wright SM, O’Rourke P. Integrating AI scribes into medical education: guardrails for preserving clinical reasoning. J Gen Intern Med. 2026;41:2598-602.
Giordano J, Jones E. AI scribe use in residency training: a call for specialty society guidance in graduate medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2026;17:1-4.
Schubert T, Oosterlinck T, Stevens RD, Maxwell PH, van der Schaar M. AI education for clinicians. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;79:102968.
Tolentino R, Hersson-Edery F, Yaffe M, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S. AIFM-ed curriculum framework for postgraduate family medicine education on artificial intelligence: mixed methods study. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e66828.
Cao W, Zhang Q, Liu J, Liu S. From agents to governance: essential ai skills for clinicians in the large language model era. J Med Internet Res. 2026;28:e86550.
Liaw W, Kueper JK, Lin S, Bazemore A, Kakadiaris I. Competencies for the use of artificial intelligence in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20:559-63.
Çalışkan SA, Demir K, Karaca O. Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: an e-delphi study for competencies. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0271872.
Russell RG, Lovett Novak L, Patel M, Garvey KV, Craig KJ, Jackson GP, et al. Competencies for the use of artificial intelligence-based tools by health care professionals. Acad Med. 2023;98:348-56.
Singla R, Pupic N, Ghaffarizadeh SA, Kim C, Hu R, Forster BB, et al. Developing a canadian artificial intelligence medical curriculum using a delphi study. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:323.
Car J, Ong QC, Erlikh Fox T, Leightley D, Kemp SJ, Švab I, et al. The digital health competencies in medical education framework. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8:e2453131.
Finkelstein M, Ludwig K, Kamath A, Halton KP, Mendelson DS. The impact of an artificial intelligence certificate program on radiology resident education. Acad Radiol. 2024;31:4709-14.
Seba F, Isola M, Mills L, Zalake M, Krive J. incorporating generative ai into a health informatics curriculum to build 21st century competencies: multisite pre-post study. JMIR Med Inform. 2025;13:e76507.
Tolentino R, Baradaran A, Gore G, Pluye P, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S. Curriculum frameworks and educational programs in artificial intelligence for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21:1477-84.
Triola MM, Rodman A. Integrating generative artificial intelligence into medical education: curriculum, policy, and governance strategies. Acad Med. 2025;100:413-8.
Aboy M, Minssen T, Vayena E. Navigating the EU ai act: implications for regulated digital medical products. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:1-6.
Saroha S. Artificial intelligence in medical education: promise, pitfalls, and practical pathways. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025;16:1039-46.
Hunt VM, Sprehe LK, de Lomba WC. What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education. NPJ Digit Med. 2026. (in press). doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02761-9.
Preiksaitis C. Supervising Resident ai use without losing the learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2026;18:12-5.
World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
World Health Organization. Regulatory considerations on artificial intelligence for health. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Médica Portuguesa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.



