Management of the Patient with Suspected Sepsis or Septic Shock: Clinical Recommendations for the Portuguese Prehospital Setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.24178Keywords:
Air Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, Portugal, Practice Guideline, Sepsis, Shock, SepticAbstract
Sepsis is a time-dependent medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and appropriate prehospital management are critical for prognosis. Despite the existence of the Sepsis Fast Track standardized by the Directorate-General of Health (Direção-Geral da Saúde), there has been underreporting of suspected sepsis cases, highlighting the urgent need to review the alert criteria. In addition, Portugal lacked specific guidelines for its activation and management in the pre-hospital setting. Considering these facts, this article aims to produce evidence-based recommendations for the standardization of the recognition and treatment of sepsis and septic shock in the Portuguese pre-hospital context, in line with the latest international guidelines and the operational capabilities of the Integrated Medical Emergency System. This guideline is the result of a comprehensive review of the literature, integrating international consensus and adapting it to the Portuguese context. For that matter, inclusion and exclusion criteria are defined for sepsis alert in the pre-hospital context, prioritizing early identification through suspected infection or changes in temperature and organ dysfunction or clinical indicators of severity, such as NEWS/NEWS2 ≥ 5, Shock Index ≥ 0.7, Mottling ≥ 2, capillary refill time > 2 seconds. Treatment depends on the type of intervention, including oxygen therapy, positioning, and temperature control for basic life support teams; balanced crystalloids, parenteral antipyretics, and early initiation of vasopressor support for differentiated teams, subject to certain assumptions for immediate life support teams. Empirical antibiotic therapy is also recommended in cases of septic shock handled by teams with a physician, namely Emergency Medical and Resuscitation Vehicles and Emergency Helicopter Service. The article also standardizes both clinical records and alert activation via the iTeams® platform and manual registries. This first national guideline for sepsis in the pre-hospital setting establishes uniform, evidence-based procedures for early recognition and treatment in this context, contributing to improved clinical outcomes, optimization of resources, and strengthened inter-hospital coordination within the sepsis fast track.
Downloads
References
Moutinho A, Fontes J, Ferreira L, Lopes J, Martins F, Mega S, et al. Sepsis alerts in the pre-hospital setting: an observational retrospective study of emergency medical services’ response in Portugal (2020–2023). Cureus. 2025;17:e82528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82528
Rudd K, Johnson S, Agesa K, Shackelford K, Tsol D, Colombara D, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
Taylor SP, Kowalkowski MA, Skewes S, Chou SH. Real-world implications of updated surviving sepsis campaign antibiotic timing recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2024;52:1002-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006240
Marshall T, Dysert K, Young M, DuMont T. Pathophysiology of sepsis. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2025;48:88-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000552
Shappell CN, Klompas M, Rhee C, Surveillance strategies for tracking sepsis incidence and outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:S74-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa102
Pinto-Villalba RS, Balseca-Arellano D, Leon-Rojas JE. Septic shock in the prehospital setting: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024;32:113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01282-2
Mellhammar L, Wollter E, Dahlberg J, Donovan B, Olséen C, Wiking P, et al. Estimating sepsis incidence using administrative data and clinical medical record review. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2331168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31168
Direção-Geral da Saúde. Norma n.º 010/2016: via-verde-sepsis-no-adulto. Lisboa: DGS; 2017.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith C, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e1063-143.
Schlapbach LJ, Watson RS, Source LR, Argent AC, Menon K, Hall MW, et al. International consensus criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock. JAMA. 2024;331:665-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.8202
James S, Abate D, Abate K, Abay S, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789-858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
Patrizio E, Zambon A, Mazzola O, Massariello F, Galeazzi M, Cavalieri d’Oro L, et al. Assessing the mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis: the role of frailty and acute organ dysfunction. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34:2335-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02182-0
Torvik MA, Nymo SH, Nymo SH, Bjornsen LP, Kvarenes HW, Ofstad EH. Patient characteristics in sepsis-related deaths: prevalence of advanced frailty, comorbidity, and age in a Norwegian hospital trust. Infection. 2023;51:1103-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02013-y
Okoye C, Piazzoli A, Ferrara MC, Finazzi A, Ornago AM, Pinardi E, et al. Enhancing in-hospital mortality prediction in older patients with sepsis: the role of frailty indices and multidrug-resistance status in non-ICU wards—a proof-of-concept study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025;37:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-02955-3
Seymour CW, Rea TD, Kahn JM, Walkey AJ, Yealy DM, Angus DC. Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:1264-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201204-0713OC
Guarino M, Perna B, Cesaro A, Mariatati M, Spampinato M, Contini C, et al. 2023 Update on sepsis and septic shock in adult patients: management in the emergency department. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093188
Hechtman RK, Kipnis P, Cano K, Seelye S, Liu V, Prescott H. Heterogeneity of benefit from earlier time-to-antibiotics for sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209:852-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202310-1800OC
Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: management of sepsis and septic shock. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;90:179-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.054
Vardy ER, Lasserson D, Barker RO, Hanratty B. NEWS2 and the older person. Clin Med. 2022;22:522-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2022-0426
Jacob A, Qudsi A, Kumar NS, Trevarthen T, Awad WI. Utilisation of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Assessment of Patient Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery. 2024;13:6850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226850
Oanesa RD, Su TW, Weissman A. Evidence for use of validated sepsis screening tools in the prehospital population: a scoping review. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28:485-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2224862
Shu E, Ives Tallman C, Frye W, Boyajian J, Farshidpour L, Young M, et al. Pre-hospital qSOFA as a predictor of sepsis and mortality. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37:1273-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.025
Usul E, Korkut S, Kayipmaz AE, Halici A, Kavalci C. The role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score (qSOFA) and modified early warning score (MEWS) in the pre-hospitalization prediction of sepsis prognosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;41:158-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.049
Middleton DJ, Smith TO, Bedford R, Neilly M, Myint PK. Shock index predicts outcome in patients with suspected sepsis or community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081144
Morris E, McCartney D, Lasserson D, Van Den Bruel A, Fisher R, Hayward G. Point-of-care lactate testing for sepsis at presentation to health care: a systematic review of patient outcomes. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67:e859-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X693665
Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, Estenssoro E, Dubin A, Hurtado J, et al. Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:654-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0071
Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle P, Galbois A, Baudel J, Lemant J, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:801-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2163-y
Mahapatra S, Heffner AC. Septic shock. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2026.
Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019:23:196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6
Herbert A, Pearn J, Wilson S. Normal percentiles for respiratory rate in children—reference ranges determined from an optical sensor. Children. 2020;7:160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children7100160
Pinto MP, Martins S, Mesquita E, Fernandes L. European Portuguese version of the clinical frailty scale: translation, cultural adaptation and validation study. Acta Med Port. 2021;34:749-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.14543
Lee HY, Lee J, Jung Y, Kwon W, Oh D, Park M, et al. Preexisting clinical frailty is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:780-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005360
Nickel CH, Kellett J. Assessing physiologic reserve and frailty in the older emergency department patient: should the paradigm change? Clin Geriatr Med. 2023;39:475-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.004
Kabell NS, Rueegg M, Carpenter C, Kaeppeli T, Busch J, Fournaise A, et al. Prognosis for older people at presentation to emergency department based on frailty and aggregated vital signs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023;71:1250-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18170
Jiahui D, Wang L, Xiong R, Liu X, Guo Z, Sun W, et al. 基于衰弱综合征建立老年脓毒症患者180 d病死率的预测评分. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021;33:257-62.
Rockwood K, Theou O. Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources. Can Geriatr J. 2020;23:254-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.23.463
Monnet X, Lai C, Teboul JL. How I personalize fluid therapy in septic shock? Crit Care. 2023;27:123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04363-3
Verras C, Ventoullis I, Bezati S, Matsiras D, Parissis J, Polyzogopoulou E. Point of care ultrasonography for the septic patient in the emergency department: a literature review. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031105
Dalla-Betta M, Esener D, Swanson W, Kaddis A, Aguayo Romero F, Fields J. The frequency of pocus in the treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study. POCUS J. 2023;8:71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i1.15683
Polyzogopoulou E, Veliou M, Verras C, Ventoulis I, Parissis J, Osterwalder J, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound: a multimodal tool for the management of sepsis in the emergency department. Medicina. 2023;59:1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061180
Choi Y, Oh S, Huh J, Joo H, Lee H, You W, et al. Deep reinforcement learning extracts the optimal sepsis treatment policy from treatment records. Commun Med. 2024;4:245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00665-x
Srzić I, Adam VN, Pejak DT. Sepsis definition: what’s new in the treatment guidelines. Acta Clin Croat. 2022;61:67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.11
Weiss SJ, Guerrero A, Root-Bowman C, Ernst A, Krumperman K, Femling J, et al. Sepsis alerts in EMS and the results of pre-hospital ETCO2. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37:1505-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.009
Cherpanath TG, Hirsch A, Geerts B, Lagrand W, Leeflang M, Schultz M, et al. Predicting fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:981-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001556
Seitz KP, Qian ET, Semler MW. Intravenous fluid therapy in sepsis. NutrClin Pract. 2022;37:990-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10892
Russo A, Salini S, Gava G, Merra G, Piccioni A, De Mattels G, et al. Reduced prognostic role of serum PCT measurement in very frail older adults admitted to the emergency department. Antibiotics. 2023;12:1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061036
Rodríguez MR, Roca FL, Díaz RR, García DE, Julián-Jiménez A. Administración precoz de la antibioterapia empírica en los pacientes atendidos con sospecha de sepsis en el servicio de urgencias: revisión sistemática. Emergencias. 2025;37:44-55.
Abdul-Aziz MH, Hammond N, Brett S, Cotta M, De Waele J, Devaux A, et al. Prolonged vs intermittent infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in adults with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2024;332:638-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.9803
Schoffelen T, Papan C, Carrara E, Eljaaly K, Paul M, Keuleyan E, et al. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship in emergency departments (endorsed by European association of hospital pharmacists). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30:1384-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.014
Cajander S, Kox M, Scicluna B, Weigand M, Mora R, Flohé S, et al. Profiling the dysregulated immune response in sepsis: overcoming challenges to achieve the goal of precision medicine. Lancet Respir Med. 2024;12:305-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00330-2
Burgunder L, Heyrend C, Olson J, Stidham C, Lane RD, Workman JK, et al. Medication and fluid management of pediatric sepsis and septic shock. Pediatric Drugs. 2022;24:193-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-022-00497-z
Marchetto L, Zanetto L, Comoretto RI, Padrin D, Menon K, Amigoni A, et al. Outcomes of pediatric fluid-refractory septic shock according to different vasoactive strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock. 2024;62:599-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002427
Ordem dos Médicos (Colégio de Medicina Intensiva) e Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos. Transporte de Doentes Críticos Recomendações. 2023. [consultado 2025 jul 15]. Disponível em: https://www.spci.pt/media/documentos/15827260365e567b2411424.pdf.
García-Uribe J, Lopera-Jaramillo D, Gutiérrez-Vargas J, Arteaga-Noriega A, Bedoya OA. Adverse effects related with norepinephrine through short peripheral venous access: scoping review. Enfermería Intensiva. 2023;34:218-26.10.1016/j.enfie.2022.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2022.09.001
Hanna M, Balintescu A, Glassford N, Lipcsey M, Eastwood G, Oldner A, et al. Glycemic lability index and mortality in critically ill patients—a multicenter cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65:1267-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13843
Lu Z, Tao G, Sun X, Zhang Y, Jiang M, Liu Y, et al. Association of blood glucose level and glycemic variability with mortality in sepsis patients during ICU hospitalization. Front Public Health. 2022;10:857368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.857368
Fujishima S, Gando S, Saitoh D, Kushimoto S, Ogura H, Abe T, et al. Incidence and impact of dysglycemia in patients with sepsis under moderate glycemic control. Shock. 2021;56:507-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001794
Drewry A, Ablordeppey E, Murray E, Stoll C, Izadi S, Dalton C, et al. Antipyretic therapy in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:806-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002285
Portugal. Portaria n.º 135/2018. Diário da República, II Série, n.º 135 (2018/07/16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0622-7171
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
