The Best-Worst Scale in Non-Oncologic Lower Limb Pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23240Keywords:
Chronic Pain, Lower Extremity, Osteoarthritis, Patient-Centered Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and QuestionnairesAbstract
Non-oncologic lower limb pain is a complex condition that influences patients’ quality of life and is challenging to manage due to its multifactorial nature. Traditional pain assessment methods focus on intensity, overlooking broader patient experiences. The Best-Worst Scale (BWS) is an approach that is increasingly used in healthcare, particularly in understanding patient preferences. The aim of this study is to map the existing research, identify key concepts, evidence types, and gaps in the literature on the management and implications of non-oncologic lower limb pain with the goal of enhancing patients’ quality of life using BWS methodology. A narrative review was performed and conducted between October and November 2024, in PubMed and the Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar. The search strategy focused on chronic non-oncologic pain of the lower limb and another one on BWS and its application to the topic under study. From 124 articles, 16 were included. Regarding BWS, the studies describe it as a promising tool for improving healthcare research, highlighting its various applications, advantages, and limitations. They address the main concerns of osteoarthritis patients and their preferences regarding available treatments. Integrating BWS into clinical practice can lead to improved perception of pain assessment and greater patient satisfaction, shaping the treatment strategy based on patient preferences. The analysis suggests that BWS is a superior approach to other forms of assessing non-oncologic pain in the lower limbs. It may allow us to identify a mismatch between the goals of clinicians and the patient’s goals. Best-worst scales to be used in this area must be carefully adjusted when in general application, and their validity and effectiveness thoroughly evaluated. Future research should focus on the implementation and development of BWS in holistic approaches, ensuring both patient-centered and evidence-based treatment. Bridging these gaps will contribute to an improvement in the quality of life of individuals suffering from non-oncologic pain in the lower limbs.
Downloads
References
Wojcieszek A, Kurowska A, Majda A, Liszka H, Gądek A. The impact of chronic pain, stiffness and difficulties in performing daily activities on the quality of life of older patients with knee osteoarthritis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:16815.
El-Tallawy SN, Nalamasu R, Salem GI, LeQuang JK, Pergolizzi JV, Christo PJ. Management of musculoskeletal pain: an update with emphasis on chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Ther. 2021;10:181-209.
Bonanni R, Cariati I, Tancredi V, Iundusi R, Gasbarra E, Tarantino U. Chronic pain in musculoskeletal diseases: do you know your enemy? J Clin Med. 2022;11:2609.
Hadi MA, McHugh GA, Closs SJ. Impact of chronic pain on patients’ quality of life: a comparative mixed-methods study. J Patient Exp. 2019;6:133-41.
Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Marczewski K, Closs SJ. ‘Treated as a number, not treated as a person’: a qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers to effective pain management of patients with chronic pain. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016454.
Santos P, Sá AB de, Santiago L, Hespanhol A. A árvore da WONCA: tradução e adaptação cultural para português. Rev Port Med Geral Familiar. 2021;37:28-35.
Ribeiro H, Rocha-Neves J, Lopes-Mota C, Teixeira-Veríssimo M, Dourado M, Andrade J. Opioides em ambulatório na dor não oncológica: uma revisão sobre os desafios da farmacologia no envelhecimento. Rev Port Med Geral Familiar. 2021;37:233-41.
Rankin L, Fowler CJ, Stålnacke BM, Gallego G. What influences chronic pain management? A best-worst scaling experiment with final year medical students and general practitioners. Br J Pain. 2019;13:214.
Zhuang J, Mei H, Fang F, Ma X. What is new in classification, diagnosis and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a narrative review. Front Pain Res. 2022;3:937004.
Goggins J, Baker K, Felson D. What WOMAC pain score should make a patient eligible for a trial in knee osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol. 2005;32:540-2.
Prazeres F, Santiago L. Relationship between health-related quality of life, perceived family support and unmet health needs in adult patients with multimorbidity attending primary care in Portugal: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:1-11.
Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6:1-14.
Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2007;26:171-89.
Coelho BM, Santiago LM. Medicina centrada na pessoa: validação populacional de um instrumento de medida pela pessoa. Rev Port Med Geral Familiar. 2022;38:247-56.
Lancsar E, Louviere J, Donaldson C, Currie G, Burgess L. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76:74-82.
Spoonemore SL, McConnell RC, Owen WE, Young JL, Clewley DJ, Rhon DI. The influence of pain-related comorbidities on pain intensity and pain-related psychological distress in patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2023;27:100532.
Krucien N, Sicsic J, Ryan M. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health. Health Econ. 2019;28:572-86.
Claassen AA, Kremers-van de Hei KC, van den Hoogen FH, van der Laan WH, Rijnen WH, Koëter S, et al. Most important frequently asked questions from patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a best-worst scaling exercise. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71:885-92.
Turk D, Boeri M, Abraham L, Atkinson J, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, et al. Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:1202-13.
Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, Mendonça L, Dias CC, Castro-Lopes JM. Epidemiology of chronic pain: a population-based nationwide study on its prevalence, characteristics and associated disability in Portugal. J Pain. 2012;13:773-83.
Branco JC, Rodrigues AM, Gouveia N, Eusébio M, Ramiro S, Machado PM, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and their impact on health-related quality of life, physical function and mental health in Portugal: results from EpiReumaPt- a national health survey. RMD Open. 2016;2:e000166.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
