Women’s Attachment as a Predictor of Pain During Labour and Post-Delivery: a Prospective Observational Study

Authors

  • José Manuel Costa Martins Departamento de Anestesiologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.
  • Carlos Fernandes da Silva Departamento de Educação. Universidade de Aveiro. Aveiro. Portugal.
  • Marco Pereira Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.
  • Henriqueta Martins Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada. Instituto Universitário. Lisboa. Portugal.
  • Célia Oliveira Departamento de Psicologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal.
  • Alexandra Puga Departamento de Anestesiologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal.
  • Rui Coelho Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental. Hospital de São João. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.
  • Jorge Tavares Departamento de Anestesiologia. Hospital de São João. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.4960

Abstract

Introduction: Labour is considered to be one of the most painful and significant experiences in a woman’s life. The aim of this study was to examine whether women’s attachment style is a predictor of the pain experienced throughout labour and post-delivery.
Material and Methods: Thirty-two pregnant women were assessed during the third trimester of pregnancy and during labour. Adult attachment was assessed with the Adult Attachment Scale – Revised. The perceived intensity of labour pain was measured using a visual analogue scale for pain in the early stage of labour, throughout labour and post-delivery.
Results: Women with an insecure attachment style reported more pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation (p < 0.05), before the administration of analgesia (p < 0.01) and post-delivery (p < 0.05) than those securely attached. In multivariate models, attachment style was a significant predictor of labour pain at 3 cm of cervical dilatation and before the first administration of analgesia but not of the perceived pain post-delivery.
Discussion: These findings confirm that labour pain is influenced by relevant psychological factors and suggest that a woman’s attachment style may be a risk factor for greater pain during labour.
Conclusion: Future studies in the context of obstetric pain may consider the attachment style as an indicator of individual differences in the pain response during labour. This may have important implications in anaesthesiology and to promote a relevant shift in institutional practices and therapeutic procedures.
Keywords: Labor Pain; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal-Fetal Relations; Object Attachment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

José Manuel Costa Martins, Departamento de Anestesiologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.

Carlos Fernandes da Silva, Departamento de Educação. Universidade de Aveiro. Aveiro. Portugal.

Marco Pereira, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.

Henriqueta Martins, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada. Instituto Universitário. Lisboa. Portugal.

Célia Oliveira, Departamento de Psicologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal.

Alexandra Puga, Departamento de Anestesiologia. Maternidade Alfredo da Costa. Lisboa. Portugal.

Rui Coelho, Departamento de Neurociências Clínicas e Saúde Mental. Hospital de São João. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.

Jorge Tavares, Departamento de Anestesiologia. Hospital de São João. Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade do Porto. Porto. Portugal.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Costa Martins JM, Silva CF da, Pereira M, Martins H, Oliveira C, Puga A, Coelho R, Tavares J. Women’s Attachment as a Predictor of Pain During Labour and Post-Delivery: a Prospective Observational Study. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2014 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];27(6):692-9. Available from: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4960