Awareness and Barriers to Guideline Adherence: Slovenian Family Physicians Survey and Qualitative Feedback
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23293Keywords:
Clinical Decision-Making, Family Practice, Guideline Adherence, Slovenia, Surveys and QuestionnairesAbstract
Introduction: Clinical practice guidelines are essential for standardizing care, yet adherence in primary care remains inconsistent globally. The aim of this study was to assess the use of clinical guidelines by family physicians in Slovenia for diagnosing and managing common conditions, to explore factors influencing guideline awareness and decision-making, and to identify barriers to adherence.
Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study surveyed family medicine specialists and trainees across public and private practices in rural and urban Slovenia. Participants completed an online questionnaire to evaluate their awareness of professional guidelines (27 guidelines made by Slovenian healthcare professionals). Furthermore, they were tested on guideline-aligned decisions (five clinical vignettes). The last question in the survey was an open-ended question on the main obstacles associated with the use of clinical guidelines.
Results: Out of 660 physicians surveyed, only 57 respondents completed the questionnaire in full (8.6% response rate). Guideline awareness varied significantly (average 60.8%), with higher knowledge of guidelines for relatively common conditions (e.g., 96% for arterial hypertension versus 12% for polycythemia vera). Correct clinical decisions according to guidelines were made in 65.2% of cases (lowest average scores for osteoporosis, 57.9%, highest for dyspepsia, 69.7%). Minimal statistically significant differences emerged between family medicine specialists and trainees (decisions regarding peripheral arterial occlusive disease, p = 0.024), public or private practice types (decisions regarding low urinary tract symptoms, p = 0.037), and urban or rural practice settings (decisions regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, p = 0.008 and p = 0.016). Answers to the open-ended question were divided into six categories according to the content: organizational limitations (lack of time and availability of guidelines), limitations related to the characteristics and quality of guidelines, team members’ lack of knowledge or work based on experience, complex patients, non-cooperative patients, and financial limitations.
Conclusion: On average, family physicians in Slovenia make clinical decisions according to guidelines in 65.2% of cases. Organizational constraints, notably workload and time pressures, are the leading obstacles to guideline adherence. Interventions such as extended consultation times, centralized digital guideline repositories, and annual update seminars are recommended. Our study highlights the need for broader research to validate strategies for enhancing guideline implementation and adherence in primary care.
Downloads
References
Popovič B. Pomen in pravni status priporočil in smernic. Slov Med Jour. 2018;87:365-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.2485
Chan WV, Pearson TA, Bennett GC, Cushman WC, Gaziano TA, Gorman PN, et al. ACC/AHA special report: clinical practice guideline implementation strategies: a summary of systematic reviews by the NHLBI implementation science work group: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1076-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000481
Drinovec J. Ali na izsledkih temelječa medicina s kliničnimi smernicami zdravnika omejuje? = Zdrav Vestn. 2006;75:653-7.
Ehrenbrusthoff K, Braun T, Bahns C, Happe L, Kopkow C. Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ljubljana. 1KA. 2022. [cited 2024 Sep 05]. Available from: https://www.1ka.si.
Ivetić V, Martinjak Š, Maksuti A. The careful assessment tool for managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms – the experience of Slovenian family medicine trainees: a qualitative study. Zdr Varst.. 2022;61:48-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0008
Overmeer T, Linton SJ, Holmquist L, Eriksson M, Engfeldt P. Do evidence-based guidelines have an impact in primary care? a cross-sectional study of swedish physicians and physiotherapists. Spine. 2005;30:146-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200501010-00024
Guncu GN, Karakoca Nemli S, Carrilho E, Yamalık N, Volodina E, Melo P, et al. Clinical guidelines and implementation into daily dental practice. Acta Med Port. 2018;31:12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.8942
Mulatero P, Monticone S, Burrello J, Veglio F, Williams TA, Funder J. Guidelines for primary aldosteronism: uptake by primary care physicians in Europe. J Hypertens. 2016;34:2253-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001088
Thachil J. Antiplatelet therapy - a summary for the general physicians. Clin Med. 2016;16:152-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-2-152
Khoong EC, Gibbert WS, Garbutt JM, Sumner W, Brownson RC. Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines. J Rural Health. 2014;30:7-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12025
Albreht T, Pribaković Brinovec R, Jošar D, Poldrugovac M, Kostnapfel T, Zaletel M, et al. Slovenia: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2016;18:1-207.
Petravić L, Bajec B, Burger E, Tiefengraber E, Slavec A, Strnad M. Emergency physician personnel crisis: a survey on attitudes of new generations in Slovenia. BMC Emerg Med. 2024;24:25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-00940-z
Wang T, Tan JY, Liu XL, Zhao I. Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e062158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062158
Barth JH, Misra S, Aakre KM, Langlois MR, Watine J, Twomey PJ, et al. Why are clinical practice guidelines not followed? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1133-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0871
Ingemansson M, Bastholm-Rahmner P, Kiessling A. Practice guidelines in the context of primary care, learning and usability in the physicians’ decision-making process – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-141
Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, Burgers JS. Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Sci. 2009;4:54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-54
Mickan S, Burls A, Glasziou P. Patterns of ‘leakage’ in the utilisation of clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2011;87:670-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.116012
Tracy CS, Dantas GC, Upshur RE. Evidence-based medicine in primary care: qualitative study of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2003;4:6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-4-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
