A Short Guide on How to Carry Out Validation of Scales Measuring Health Outcomes
Keywords:Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size, Surveys and Questionnaires, Validation Studies as Topic
Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD, Hofstadter MB. the yale preoperative anxiety scale: how does it compare with a “gold standard”? Anesth Analg. 1997;85:783-8.
Simms LJ. Classical and modern methods of psychological scale construction. social and personality psychology compass. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2:414-33.
Carpenter S. Ten steps in scale development and reporting: a guide for researchers. communication methods and measures. Commun Methods Meas. 2017;12:25-44.
Dima AL. Scale validation in applied health research: tutorial for a 6-step r-based psychometrics protocol. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018;6:136-61.
Kyriazos TA, Stalikas A. Applied psychometrics: the steps of scale development and standardization process. Psychology. 2018;09:2531-60.
Arafat SM, Chowdhury H, Qusar MM, Hafez MA. Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: a methodological review. J Behav Health. 2016;5:129-36.
Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149.
Nguyen TH, Paasche-Orlow MK, Kim MT, Han HR, Chan KS. Modern measurement approaches to health literacy scale development and refinement: overview, current uses, and next steps. J Health Commun. 2015;20:S112-5.
Badenes-Ribera L, Silver NC, Pedroli E. Editorial: scale development and score validation. Front Psychol. 2020;11:799.
Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;70:394-400.
Anthoine E, Moret L, Regnault A, Sbille V, Hardouin JB. Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:1-10.
Rouquette A, Falissard B. Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011;20:235-49.
Umemneku Chikere CM, Wilson K, Graziadio S, Vale L, Allen AJ. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: a systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - an update. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223832.
Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
Barbosa AC, Costa AI, Garcia S, Dias R, Mesquita E. AnsT-19: development and validation of a scale to access the anxiety of family physicians during teleconsultation. Acta Med Port. 2023;36:236-45.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.