Evaluation of the Scientific Production in the Field of General Practice and Family Medicine in Portugal

Authors

  • João Pedro da Fonseca Marques Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Portugal.
  • Luiz Miguel Santiago Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Portugal; Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.
  • Helena Donato Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Portugal; Serviço de Documentação e Informação Científica. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.19750

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, Family Practice, Portugal, Publishing/statistics & numerical data

Abstract

Introduction: The Portuguese publications in the field of General Practice and Family Medicine have not yet been assessed in bibliometric studies. The aim of this study was to analyze that production between 2012 and 2022.
Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection was used to gather the number of articles, journals and citations obtained; the Journal Citation Reports to obtain the Impact Factor and quartile of journals; and Scimago Journal & Country Rank, for the comparison of data with other European countries. The search was based on the following query: “usf OR unidade de Saude Familiar OR centro de Saude OR ACeS OR medicina geral familiar OR Gen Practice Family SAME Portugal”, and a time window between 2012 and 2022 was defined. The study considered the following quantitative indicators: total number of publications, typology, language, affiliation, co-authors, geographical distribution, thematic areas, and the number of publications/inhabitant and publications/physician from European countries; the qualitative indicators selected were the Impact Factor (IF), the quartile and the number of citations.
Results: Between 2012 and 2022, the national scientific production had an average annual growth rate of 36.6%. Of 389 publications, 73.8% were ‘Articles’ and 11.8% were ‘Review Articles’, predominantly in English (88.4%). The fields of ‘General Internal Medicine’ (24.7%) and ‘Public Environmental Health’ (14.9%) had the highest publication rates among the journals. The 389 publications received 5354 citations, for an average of 13.76 citations per article, and the average yearly citation growth was 115%. According to IF, 22.5% of the 222 journals belonged to Q4, 27.5% to Q3, 29.7% to Q2 and 20.3% to Q1, and therefore no significant bias regarding the journals where Portuguese doctors publish was observed.
Conclusion: The bibliometric analysis allowed us to examine the evolution of the scientific production in the field of Portuguese General Practice and Family Medicine by observing an increasing publication trend and with a high potential for publication growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25:348.

Mouako AL, Zunza M, Ndwandwe D, Uthman OA, Wiysonge CS. Health research publications by South African authors from 1996 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;42:31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.42.31.28968

Donato H, Oliveira C. Avaliação da produção científica portuguesa na área da ginecologia e obstetrícia baseada em indicadores bibliométricos. Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2009;3:107-14.

Allan GM, Kraut R, Crawshay A, Korownyk C, Vandermeer B, Kolber MR. Contributors to primary care guidelines: what are their professions and how many of them have conflicts of interest? Can Fam Physician. 2015;61:52-8.

Brumback RA. Worshiping false idols: the impact factor dilemma. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:365-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073808315170

Birbeck GL, Wiysonge CS, Mills EJ, Frenk JJ, Zhou XN, Jha P. Global health: the importance of evidence-based medicine. BMC Med. 2013;11:223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-223

Sebo P. General internal medicine and family medicine journals: comparative study of published articles using bibliometric data. Medicine. 2020;99:e20586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020586

Ma H, Cheng BR, Chang AH, Chang HT, Lin MH, Chen TJ, et al. Internationalisation of general practice journals: a bibliometric analysis of the science citation index database. Aust J Prim Health. 2022;28:76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY21069

del Mar C, Askew D. Building family/general practice research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:S35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.146

Krztoń-Królewiecka A, Švab I, Oleszczyk M, Seifert B, Smithson WH, Windak A. The development of academic family medicine in central and eastern Europe since 1990. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-37

van Weel C, Kassai R. Expanding primary care in South and East Asia. BMJ. 2017;356:j634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j634

Dunikowski LG, Freeman TR. Impact of family medicine research: bibliometrics and beyond. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62:266-8.

Piel G. The social process of science. Science. 1986;231:201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.231.4735.201

Donato HM, de Oliveira CF. Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators. Acta Med Port. 2006;19:225-34.

Mahrer K. Sages of the ages. Leading Edge. 2000;19:648-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438686

Donato H, de Oliveira CF. Bibliometry of cancer in Portugal: 1997 to 2006. Acta Med Port. 2009;22:41-50.

van Driel ML, Maier M, de Maeseneer J. Measuring the impact of family medicine research: scientific citations or societal impact? Fam Pract. 2007;24:401-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmm061

McVeigh ME, Mann SJ. The journal impact factor denominator: defining citable (counted) items. JAMA. 2009;302:1107-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1301

Marques JP. Avaliação da produção científica portuguesa na área da medicina geral e familiar. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra; 2023.

Lin MH, Hwang SJ, Hwang IH, Chen YC. Family medicine publications in Taiwan: an analysis of the Web of Science database from 1993 to 2012. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014;77:583-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2014.05.015

Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

Published

2024-01-12

How to Cite

1.
da Fonseca Marques JP, Santiago LM, Donato H. Evaluation of the Scientific Production in the Field of General Practice and Family Medicine in Portugal. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 12 [cited 2024 Apr. 13];37(2):100-9. Available from: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19750

Issue

Section

Original