The Transparency of Science with ChatGPT and the Emerging Artificial Intelligence Language Models: Where Should Medical Journals Stand?

Authors

  • Helena Donato Acta Médica Portuguesa. Ordem dos Médicos. Lisboa; Serviço de Documentação e Informação Científica. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra.
  • Pedro Escada Acta Médica Portuguesa. Ordem dos Médicos. Lisboa; NOVA Medical School. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa.
  • Tiago Villanueva Acta Médica Portuguesa. Ordem dos Médicos. Lisboa; Unidade de Saúde Familiar Reynaldo dos Santos. Póvoa de Santa Iria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.19694

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Authorship, Ethics, Research, Publishing, Science/ethics

Abstract

N/a.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379:313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879

Vallance C. ChatGPT: New AI chatbot has everyone talking to it. [consultado 2023 jan 27]. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-63861322.

Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613:423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

AI writing: The challenge and opportunity in front of education now. [consultado 2023 jan 27]. Disponível em: https://www.turnitin.com/blog/ai-writing-thechallenge-and-opportunity-in-front-of-education-now.

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613:612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

1.
Donato H, Escada P, Villanueva T. The Transparency of Science with ChatGPT and the Emerging Artificial Intelligence Language Models: Where Should Medical Journals Stand?. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2023 Feb. 1 [cited 2024 May 28];36(3):147-8. Available from: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19694

Issue

Section

Editorial