Impact of Lifting Mask Mandates on COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Portugal: An Ecological Study
Keywords:COVID-19, Masks, Pandemics, Portugal, SARS-CoV-2
Introduction: The use of face masks in public was one of several COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions adopted to mitigate the pandemic in Portugal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lifting the mask mandate on the April 22, 2022 on COVID-19 incidence and mortality in mainland Portugal and in the Azores. As a secondary objective, we aimed to evaluate the evolution of COVID-19 cases in a setting without a mask mandate (Azores islands) and in a setting with a mask mandate (Madeira islands).
Methods: Surveillance data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 deaths were used to conduct an interrupted time series analysis to estimate changes in daily incidence and deaths during a mask mandate period (28th March – 21st April 2022) and during a post-mask mandate period (22nd April – 15th May 2022), in mainland Portugal and the Azores. In a second phase, for each group of islands, we fitted a negative binomial regression model, with daily COVID-19 incident cases as the primary outcome of interest, and relative frequency of Omicron BA.5 lineage as explanatory variable.
Results: Significant changes in trends were observed for the overall incidence rate and COVID-19 deaths; increasing trends were observed for COVID-19 incidence and deaths in the post mandate period [5.3% per day; incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.053; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.029 - 1.078] and [3.2% per day; mortality rate ratio (MRR): 1.032; 95% CI: 1.003 - 1.062], respectively. For every unit increase in the percentage of Omicron BA.5 lineage there was a 1.5% increase per day (IRR: 1.015; 95% CI: 1.006 - 1.024) in COVID-19 incidence rate in the Azores islands, while for Madeira islands an increase of 0.05% COVID-19 cases per day was observed (IRR: 1.005; 95% CI: 1.000 - 1.010).
Conclusion: Lifting the mask mandate in Portugal was associated with an increase in COVID-19 incidence and deaths, thus highlighting the positive effect of face mask policies in preventing respiratory virus transmission and saving lives.
República Portuguesa XXII Governo. Legislação COVID-19. [cited 2022 Feb 23]. Available from: https://dre.pt/dre/geral/legislacao-covid-19.
Portugal. Decree-Law nr. 30-E/2022. Official Gazette, I Series, nr. 78 (2022/04/21). p.2–3.
Portugal. Decree Law nr.26-A/2023. Official Gazette, I Series, nr. 75 (2023/04/17). p.2.
Our World in Data. COVID-19: Face coverings . [cited 2022 Jul 31]. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-face-coverings.
Our World in Data. Coronavirus (COVID-19) cases . [cited 2022 Jul 31]. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-cases.
Adjodah D, Dinakar K, Chinazzi M, Fraiberger SP, Pentland A, Bates S, et al. Association between COVID-19 outcomes and mask mandates, adherence, and attitudes. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.19.21250132
Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, van der Westhuizen HM, et al. An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
Abboah-Offei M, Salifu Y, Adewale B, Bayuo J, Ofosu-Poku R, Opare-Lokko EB. A rapid review of the use of face mask in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021;3:100013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100013
Altman G, Ahuja J, Monrad JT, Dhaliwal G, Rogers-Smith C, Leech G, et al. A dataset of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 in Europe. Sci Data. 2022;9:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01175-y
Motallebi S, Cheung RC, Mohit B, Shahabi S, Alishahi Tabriz A, Moattari S. Modeling COVID-19 mortality across 44 countries: face covering may reduce deaths. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62:483–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.09.019
Public Health Ontario. Association between mask mandates and population-level COVID-19 outcomes – what we know so far. Ontario: PHO; 2022.
Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge. Genetic diversity of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Portugal. Lisbon: INSA; 2022.
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:348–55.
Nunes B, Caetano C, Dias C. Statistics in times of pandemics: the role of statistical and epidemiological methods during the COVID-19 emergency. Revstat Stat J. 2020;18:553–64.
Torres AR, Rodrigues AP, Sousa-Uva M, Kislaya I, Silva S, Antunes L, et al. Impact of stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions applied during the second and third COVID-19 epidemic waves in Portugal, 9 november 2020 to 10 february 2021: an ecological study. Eurosurveill. 2022;27:1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.23.2100497
Statistics Portugal. Estimates of resident population. [cited 2022 May 27]. Available from: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0011166&xlang=pt.
Borges V, Pinheiro M, Pechirra P, Guiomar R, Gomes JP. INSaFLU: an automated open web-based bioinformatics suite “from-reads” for influenza wholegenome-sequencing-based surveillance. Genome Med. 2018;10:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0555-0
Brandal LT, MacDonald E, Veneti L, Ravlo T, Lange H, Naseer U, et al. Outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in Norway, november to december 2021. Eurosurveill. 2021;26:1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.50.2101147
Direção-Geral da Saúde. Pessoas com mais de 80 anos e residentes em lares vão receber segunda dose de reforço. Lisbon: DGS; 2022.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
Stevens NT, Sen A, Kiwon F, Morita PP, Steiner SH, Zhang Q. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions and population mobility on daily COVID-19 cases: evidence from Ontario. Can Public Policy. 2022;48:144–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-022
Google. COVID-19 Community mobility reports. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Opinião Social: Perceção de risco acompanha situação epidemiológica e é sensível ao contexto. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: https://barometro-covid-19.ensp.unl.pt/opiniao-social-percecao-de-risco-acompanha-situacao-epidemiologica-e-e-sensivel-ao-contexto/.
Yasutaka T, Murakami M, Iwasaki Y, Naito W, Onishi M, Fujita T, et al. Assessment of COVID-19 risk and prevention effectiveness among spectators of mass gathering events. Microb Risk Anal. 2022;21:100215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2022.100215
Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge. COVID-19: curva epidémica e parâmetros de transmissibilidade. [cited 2022 May 7]. Available from: http://www.insa.min-saude.pt/category/areas-de-atuacao/epidemiologia/covid-19-curva-epidemica-e-parametros-de-transmissibilidade.
Tegally H, Moir M, Everatt J, Giovanetti M, Scheepers C, Wilkinson E, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 omicron lineages BA.4 and BA.5 in South Africa. Nat Med. 2022;28:1785-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01911-2
Cao Y, Yisimayi A, Jian F, Song W, Xiao T, Wang L, et al. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature. 2022;608:593–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04980-y
Callaway E. What the latest omicron subvariants mean for the pandemic. Nature. 2022;606:848–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01730-y
Reiner RC, Barber RM, Collins JK, Zheng P, Adolph C, Albright J, et al. Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States. Nat Med. 2021;27:94–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1132-9
Mitze T, Kosfeld R, Rode J, Walde K. Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:32293–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015954117
Tuekprakhon A, Huo J, Nutalai R, Dijokaite-Guraliuc A, Zhou D, Ginn HM, et al. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum. Cell. 2022;185:2422–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.005
Morgenstern H. Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:1336–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.72.12.1336
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.