Medico-Legal Examination of Sexual Assaulted Victims Unable to Consent in Portugal: Ethical Decision-Making

Authors

  • Bárbara Santa-Rosa Bioethical Institute. Faculty of Medicine. University of Coimbra. Coimbra. National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences. North and Centre Branches. Coimbra and Oporto.
  • Margarida Silvestre Bioethical Institute. Faculty of Medicine. University of Coimbra. Coimbra. Reproductive Medicine Department. Coimbra Hospital and University Centre. Coimbra.
  • Duarte Nuno Vieira Bioethical Institute. Faculty of Medicine. University of Coimbra. Coimbra.
  • Francisco Corte Real National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences. North and Centre Branches. Coimbra and Oporto.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.17166

Keywords:

Child Abuse, Sexual, Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence, Forensic Medicine, Informed Consent, Mandatory Reporting

Abstract

Medical decision-making is a complex task in any field. In the medico-legal examination of victims that have (allegedly) been sexually assaulted there are many specific variables and features influencing the decision. It is essential to complement the clinical intervention with a forensic approach. Clinical parameters such as the victim’s physical and cognitive state along with circumstantial information such as the elapsed time from the event and the type of abuse (described or suspected) grant different levels of priority to the forensic medical assessment. In such cases, forensic medical doctors or other medical doctors responsible for attending to the victim may have to decide whether to perform the examination prior to a judicial analysis of the case if consent cannot be obtained. This implies the need to deliberate about performing the examination and/or reporting the case to legal authorities. This article discusses the forensic medical decision-making process in cases of alleged recent sexual assault of victims who are legally unable to consent or unable to consent for other reasons. We aimed to identify possible ethical problems that can arise in this context and discuss which elements should be considered by medical doctors when making decisions about such cases. The Portuguese legal framework of medico-legal examinations is analyzed. The authors also make considerations about reporting these cases from a legal point of view. The discussion turns to an ethical perspective where possible ethical problems arising from medical deliberation are identified. Issues about legally incompetent victims and incompetent victims due to other reasons are addressed. A decision-making tree, based on the problems identified, is proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Portugal. Decree-Law no. 18/2019. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 6 (2019/01/14). p.121-4.

Portugal. Law no. 45/2004. 13rd article of Legal Framework on Medicolegal Exams. Official Gazette, I-A Series, no. 210 (2014/09/06). p.5363-4.

Portugal. Law no. 45/2004. 4th article of Legal Framework on Medicolegal Exams. Official Gazette no. 210/2004, I-A Series (2014/09/06).p.5362.

Hunink M, Weinstein M, Wittenberg E, Drummond M, Pliskin J, Wong J, et al. Elements of decision-making in health care. In: Decision-making

in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p.1-32.

Portugal. Decree-Law no. 78/87. 151st article of Portuguese Criminal Procedure Code. Official Gazette 40/1987, I Series (1987/02/17). p.82.

Portugal. Law no. 72/2013. Road Traffic Code. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 105 (2013/05/31). p.1-10.

Portugal. Law no. 707/2016. 124th article of Regulation, Portuguese Medical Association Code of Ethics. Official Gazette, II Series, no. 139 (2016/07/21). p.13.

Portugal. Law no. 65/98. 150th article of Portuguese Criminal Code. Official Gazette, I-A Series, no. 202 (1998/09/02). p.2-3.

Portugal. Law no. 48/95. 156th article of Portuguese Criminal Code. Official Gazette, I-A Series, no. 63 (1995/03/15).

Portugal. Law no. 707/2016. 104th article of Regulation, Portuguese Medical Association Code of Ethics. Official Gazette, II Series, no. 139 (2016/07/21). p.12.

Pereira A. Informed consent in forensic medicine. Rev Port Dano Corp. 2005;15:11-45.

Portugal. Law no. 30/2015. 386th article of Portuguese Criminal Code. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 78 (2015/04/22). p.2.

Levi B, Loeben G. Index of Suspicion: feeling not believing. Theor Med. 2004;25:277-310.

Levi B, Portwood S. Reasonable suspicion of child abuse: finding a common language. J Law Med Ethics. 2011;39:62-9.

Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p.3.

Gracia D. Ethical case deliberation and decision-making. Med Health Care Phil. 2003;6:227-33.

Pinto da Costa D. Public crimes and semi-public crimes: when to denounce? Rev Port Dano Corp. 2008;18:99-115.

Portugal. Law no. 58/2007. 38th article of Portuguese Criminal Code. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 170 (2007/09/04).

Council of Europe. 6th article of the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. ETS No. 164. (1997/04/04). p.3.

Portugal. Law no. 112/2009. 16th article of Prevention of Domestic Violence. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 180 (2009/09/16). p.3-4

Portugal. Law no. 3/1984. 24th article of Sexual Education and Family Planning. Official Gazette, I Series, no. 71 (1984/03/24). p.981-3.

Ricoeur P. Autonomy and vulnerability. In: Ricoeur P, editor. Reflections on the just. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2001. p.72-90.

Bow J, Quinnell F, Zaroff M, Assemany A. Assessment of sexual abuse allegations in child custody cases. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2002;33:566-75.

Greenberg L, Martindale A, Gould J, Gould-Saltman DJ. Ethical issues in child custody and dependency cases: enduring principles and emerging challenges. J Child Custody. 2004;1:7-30.

Santa Rosa B, Corte Real, Vieira DN. Respecting minors’ autonomy in child custody cases. Acta Med Port. 2013;26:637-43.

Rudy L, Goodman G. Effect of participation on children’s reports: implications for children’s testimony. Del Psychol. 1991;27:527-38.

Pierce-Weeks J, Campbell P. The challenges forensic nurses face when their patient is comatose: addressing the needs of our most vulnerable patient population. J Forensic Nurs. 2008;3:104-10.

Carr M, Moettus A. Developing a policy for sexual assault examinations on incapacitated patients and patients unable to consent. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38:647-53.

Lavin M. Ethical issues in forensic psychology. In O’Donohe W, Levensky E, editors. Handbook of forensic psychology: resources for mental health and legal professionals. New York: Elsevier Science; 2004. p.46-63.

Barnao M, Robertson P, Ward T. Ethical decision-making and forensic practice. Br J Forensic Pract. 2012;14:81-91.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-02

How to Cite

1.
Santa-Rosa B, Silvestre M, Vieira DN, Corte Real F. Medico-Legal Examination of Sexual Assaulted Victims Unable to Consent in Portugal: Ethical Decision-Making. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 2 [cited 2023 Feb. 4];35(12):917-23. Available from: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/17166

Issue

Section

Guidelines