Workplace Violence in Healthcare: A Single-Center Study on Causes, Consequences and Prevention Strategies

Authors

  • Helena Sofia Antão Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa. Emergency Department. Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando da Fonseca. Amadora. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5045-1625
  • Ema Sacadura-Leite CISP - Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública. CHRC - Comprehensive Health Research Center. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa.
  • Maria João Manzano Occupational Health Department. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa.
  • Sónia Pinote Occupational Health Department. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa.
  • Rui Relvas Occupational Health Department. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa.
  • Florentino Serranheira CISP - Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública. CHRC - Comprehensive Health Research Center. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa.
  • António Sousa-Uva CISP - Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública. CHRC - Comprehensive Health Research Center. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11465

Keywords:

Healthcare Workers, Occupational Hazard, Occupational Health, Prevention, Workplace Violence

Abstract

Introduction: Workplace violence is one of the main risk factors in the professional world. Healthcare workers are at higher risk when compared to other sectors. Our study aimed to characterize physical and verbal violence in a public hospital and to define occupational health prevention and surveillance strategies.
Material and Methods: Single center observational cross-sectional study, carried amongst healthcare workers in a public hospital in Lisbon. A qualitative survey was carried out through six in-depth interviews. A quantitative survey was carried through questionnaires delivered to 32 workers. A significance level of 5% was accepted in the assessment of statistical differences. The Mann-Whitney test and the Fisher’s exact test were used to calculate p values.
Results: The main results are: (1) 41 violence incidents were reported in the quantitative phase; (2) 5/21 [23.81%] victims notified the incident to the occupational health department; (3) 18/21 [85.71%] victims reported a permanent state of hypervigilance; (4) 22/28 [78.57%] participants self-reported poor or no familiarity with internal reporting procedures; (5) 24/28 [85.71%] participants believed it is possible to minimize workplace violence.
Discussion: Workplace violence is favored by unrestricted access to working areas, absence of security guards and police officers or scarce intervention. The low notification rate contributes to organizational lack of action. The state of hypervigilance reported in our study reflects the negative effects of threatening occupational stressors on mental health.
Conclusion: Our results show that workplace violence is a relevant risk factor that significantly impacts workers’ health in a noxious manner, deserving a tailored occupational health approach whose priority areas and strategies have been determined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-03

How to Cite

1.
Antão HS, Sacadura-Leite E, Manzano MJ, Pinote S, Relvas R, Serranheira F, Sousa-Uva A. Workplace Violence in Healthcare: A Single-Center Study on Causes, Consequences and Prevention Strategies. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 3 [cited 2024 Apr. 18];33(1):31-7. Available from: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/11465

Issue

Section

Original