Untitled
esquerda


Leia a Última Edição!

II Serie Volume 33 Number 9
September 2020

E-ALERT:

menu esquerda
 
   
 
 
 
 


  1- Factors of recurrence of intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.

2- Duodenoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic pathology.

3- Mephedrone (?Meow Meow?), The New Designer Drug of Abuse: Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynimics and Clinical and Forensic Issues

4- Natural history of fetal pyelocaliectasia.

5- Antidepressant drugs.

6- Erysipelas.

7- Pressure ulcer management--Evidence-based interventions.

8- Traumatic Brain Injury: Integrated Approach

9- Genital ulcers caused by sexually transmitted diseases: current therapies, diagnosis and their relevance in HIV pandemy.

10- Current management of gout.

11- Livedo vasculitis.

12- Tarlov's cyst: definition, etiopathogenesis, propaedeutic and treatment.

13- Antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in non-pregnant women up to menopause.

14- Urolithiasis and renal colic. Therapeutic approach in urology.

15- Uterine inversion.

16- Surgical basic skills: surgical sutures.

17- Rhabdomyolysis.

18- Systemic family therapy: a new concept, a new practice.

19- Pancreatic ectopia.

20- Pancreatic ectopia.

 
   

Tom Jefferson: The evolution of RIAT and the ideas behind it



The idea of RIAT was born in a specific time period: the early part of this decade. This was when we started realising that clinical trials published in traditional biomedical journals were in the best case scenario extreme summaries of clinical study reports and other documents which contained extensive descriptions of the design, conduct and results. The underlying richness of detail and data, which was astonishing for those who had been used to journal articles, allowed two important aspects of scrutiny. First, we could do many more analyses and look at traditionally neglected aspects, such as harms reporting. This was not possible with journal articles. Second, we and other groups started noticing what we called discrepancies between the content of clinical study reports and their published counterparts. The discrepancies were misreporting in most cases.

Full article here (English only).